PER CURIAM. Appellant Lanard Woody appeals his conviction and sentence for robbery and petit theft. We find no error as to the robbery conviction, and affirm the judgment and sentence imposed for that offense. However, we find that the companion charge of petit theft was subsumed within the robbery charge. Accordingly, we remand this case to the trial court with instructions to vacate appellant’s conviction for petit theft. SCHOONOVER, C.J., and CAMPBELL and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.