PER CURIAM. The appealed orders in this case are affirmed, except as to the requirement that the appellant pay $255 to the clerk of the court as “restitution.” The clerk was not the vie-' tim in this case, and the specified payment was orally pronounced as court costs. The written restitution order is therefore vacated, and the case is remanded for a proper imposition of costs. MINER, ALLEN and MICKLE, JJ., concur.