AGILUS HEALTH (Albert Atwood, Jr.) v. DRESSER, INC., et al., 35 So. 3d 443

CHATELAIN , Judge. | ,The appellee, Agilus Health, Inc., moves to dismiss the suspensive appeal of the appellants, Dresser, Inc. and Liberty-Mutual Insurance Company, and to convert their appeal to a devolutive appeal. The appellee contends that the appellants posted their suspensive appeal bond untimely. Finding that the posting of the bond was timely in accordance with La. R.S. 23.T310.5, we deny the motion to dismiss.

Following trial of this matter, the workers’ compensation judge (WCJ) rendered a money judgment against the appellants, finding that the appellee had been underpaid by the appellants in the sum of $610.60 for health care bills associated with a work-related injury to Albert Atwood, Jr. The WCJ also cast the appellants with a $2,000.00 statutory penalty and with $3,000.00 in attorney fees. The WCJ signed the written judgment on December 15, 2009. On December 16, 2009, the trial court mailed notice of this judgment to all counsel of record. No motion for new trial was filed.

The appellants filed their motion and order for appeal on January 6, 2010, and the order was granted by the WCJ that same date. Appellants also filed on that date a Motion and Order to Set Bond for Suspensive Appeal, which order was signed by the WCJ setting a hearing for February 8, 2010. The hearing on the bond amount was conducted on February 8, 2010, at which time the WCJ set the bond amount. On February 10, 2010, the WCJ signed an order setting the bond amount at $5,973.00. The appellants posted the sus-pensive appeal bond on March 2, 2010. The record was subsequently lodged in this court.

The appellee filed a motion to convert the appeal from suspensive to devolutive, arguing that the appellants failed to post their suspensive appeal bond |2within thirty days of notice of the final judgment, as provided in La.Code Civ.P. 2123. The appellants filed an opposition memorandum in this court, contending that the suspen-sive appeal bond was timely posted within thirty days of the notice of the setting of the bond’s amount as provided in La. R.S. 23:1310.5(0.

In a case involving substantially similar facts, this court has issued an opinion on this date, finding that the posting of the suspensive appeal bond within thirty days of the notice of the setting of the bond amount was timely. Agilus Health (Kenneth McKeithen) v. Dresser, Inc., 10-313 (La.App. 3 Cir. 4/14/10), 36 So.3d 385. For those same reasons, we hereby deny the motion to dismiss the appellants’ suspen-sive appeal. MOTION TO DISMISS SUSPENSIVE APPEAL AND CONVERT TO DEVOL-UTIVE APPEAL DENIED. Honorable David E.

Chatelain participated in this decision by appointment of the Louisiana Supreme Court as Judge Pro Tempore.