ATOMIC FUEL EXTRACTION CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. ESTATE of Tom SLICK et al., Respondents, 403 S.W.2d 784

PER CURIAM. We refuse the application for writ of error with the notation “no reversible error.” 386 S.W.2d 180. However, such action is not to be construed as approval of that part of the Court of Civil Appeals’ opinion which holds that only nominal damages may be recovered for the loss of sales of uranium concentrates. POPE, J., not sitting.