White, Presiding" Judge. It is provided by the Code that “ in all cases less than capital the defendant is required, when his cause is called for trial, before it proceeds further, to plead by himself or his counsel whether, or not he is guilty.” (Code Crim. Proc., art. 603.) “By the term 1 called for trial’ is meant the stage of the cause when both parties have announced that they are ready, or when a continuance, having been applied for, has been denied.” (Code Crim.

Proc., art. 604.) “ The plea of not guilty may be made by defendant or by his counsel in open court, and in all cases where the defendant refuses to plead the plea of not guilty shall be entered for him by the court.” (Code Crim. Proc., art. 536.) It followsnfrom the above that, when the case is called for trial, and before it proceeds further, the defendant, by himself or his counsel, must plead whether or not he is guilty (Cole v. The State, 11 Texas Ct. App., 68), and that it is only where defendant or counsel refuses thus to plead that the court is authorized to enter a plea of not guilty for him.

Without a plea there is and can be no issue for the jury to try or the court to determine. It is absolutely essential to a valid trial. In the case before us, defendant’s motion for new trial, and also his motion in arrest of judgment, allege that defendant was not offered the privilege of pleading, and never did plead to the indictment, and he moved the court to have the judgment entry corrected where- it alleged that a plea was entered by defendant. Affidavits of defendant and third parties were filed in support of these motions.

These affidavits were not even attempted to be controverted or denied by the State. The motions should have been sustained. (Wilkins v. The State, 15 Texas Ct. App., 420; Smith v. The State, 4 Texas Ct. App., 626.) Reversed and remanded. [Opinion delivered November 26, 1884.]